<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Timezone on Stack Research</title><link>https://stackresearch.org/tags/timezone/</link><description>Recent content in Timezone on Stack Research</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://stackresearch.org/tags/timezone/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Should Agency Drift with Time?</title><link>https://stackresearch.org/editorial/should-agency-drift-with-time/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://stackresearch.org/editorial/should-agency-drift-with-time/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In an example incident, cron jobs configured for &lt;code&gt;America/Chicago&lt;/code&gt; fired around 9 hours early from a continuously running gateway, and day-of-week constraints were ignored on a nightly wake path (&lt;a href="https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/issues/42740"&gt;issue #42740&lt;/a&gt;).
The system did not restart. It simply decided future work was due now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nothing crashed. Every subsystem was internally consistent.
The commitment was still wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a familiar move in software culture after moments like this: we ask whether the system can be trusted.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>